Synergies and trade‐offs of ecosystem services were observed. About 9% of records provided evidence for the disruption rather than provision of ecosystem services. on water quality, past environments and historical societies), ornamental and other cultural contributions, and ( iii) the filtration, sequestration, storage and/or transformation of biological and physico‐chemical water properties. Prominent ecosystem services included ( i) the provisioning of food, materials and medicinal products, ( ii) knowledge acquisition (e.g. Our systematic literature review resulted in a data set of 904 records from 69 countries relating to 24 classes of provisioning ( N = 189), cultural ( N = 491) and regulating ( N = 224) services following the Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES). Here we synthesise the global evidence on ecosystem services provided and disrupted by freshwater bivalves, a heterogenous group of >1200 species, including some of the most threatened (in Unionida) and invasive (e.g. the contributions that ecosystems make to human well‐being, has proven instrumental in galvanising public and political support for safeguarding biodiversity and its benefits to people. Identification of ecosystem services, i.e.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |